The article by Michael Pollock explores how important it is for states to take responsibility for managing ‘irresponsible gaming’. The gaming industry has come a long way since its early days, and with that progress comes the need for strict adherence to responsible gaming practices. Pollock advocates for clear definitions and regulation that maintains the integrity of legal gaming.
Key Points
- The term “irresponsible gaming” lacks clear definitions but is essential for protecting industry standards.
- Responsible gaming practices have evolved significantly since the 1970s, highlighting the industry’s growth.
- States must ensure that they maintain strict licencing standards to promote trust in legal gaming.
- Efforts to legalise forms of illegal gaming could undermine responsible gaming initiatives.
- Preserving the distinction between legal and illegal gaming is vital for public trust and investor confidence.
Why should I read this?
If you’re even remotely interested in gaming regulations and ethics, this article is a must-read! Pollock lays down some challenges that could impact the industry’s future. Ignoring irresponsible gaming can lead to a slippery slope for states. You’ll want to be in the know about how these changes may affect the gaming landscape — and your interests.