What’s behind Malta’s disagreement with the European Commission?
Summary
The European Commission has expressed concerns regarding Malta’s Article 56A, claiming it violates EU law by shielding local gaming operators from legal challenges across the EU. This article discusses the implications of this disagreement and the historical context of Malta’s approach to EU regulations.
Key Points
- The European Commission sent a formal letter to Malta’s government, raising issues with compliance regarding Article 56A of the Gaming Act.
- Article 56A aims to protect Malta-licensed firms from being sued in other EU jurisdictions.
- The Commission argues this clause undermines mutual trust in legal jurisdictions across Europe.
- Malta defends Article 56A, stating it aligns with its interpretation of the EU’s Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
- Malta is given two months to respond or face further action from the Commission.
Why should I read this?
If you’re keen on understanding the tension between national legislation and EU regulations, especially in the booming iGaming industry, this article is a must-read. Malta’s stance could set a precedent for other jurisdictions and impact international legal frameworks in gaming.
