A tribunal has awarded a former employee of Dermalogica UK £24,042.08 after she was unfairly dismissed on her day off. Joanne Neill, a part-time worker, received the news of her redundancy via a misleading video call titled ‘catch up’. The tribunal highlighted the lack of proper communication and support, especially considering Neill’s mental health challenges during the process.
Key Points
- Joanne Neill was informed of her redundancy during a video call on her day off.
- The tribunal ruled her dismissal was unfair due to the way the meeting was conducted.
- Judge Liz Ord emphasised the misleading nature of the meeting’s title contributed to her lack of preparation.
- Neill’s case has brought attention to how sensitive redundancy communications should be, especially for employees with mental health issues.
- The ruling reflects ongoing conversations about the rights of part-time workers and fair treatment during redundancies.
Why should I read this?
This article sheds light on an important legal ruling that highlights the critical need for proper communication and support during redundancy processes. If you’re working in HR or management, you’ll want to know how to handle these situations better. Plus, it’s a reminder that even seemingly minor decisions like how to title a meeting can have big consequences!